Efficacy of Ramucirumab Versus Sorafenib as Subsequent Treatment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The present study aimed to examine the therapeutic efficacy of ramucirumab compared with that of sorafenib as subsequent systemic therapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and serum α-fetoprotein (AFP) levels ≥400 ng/ml. PATIENTS AND METHODS In our prospectively registered, real-world cohort, 13 and 11 patients treated with ramucirumab or sorafenib, respectively, were analyzed. Progression-free survival (PFS) was primarily compared between the ramucirumab and sorafenib groups. RESULTS The PFS was significantly longer in the ramucirumab group than in the sorafenib group (median, 2.7 vs. 0.9 months, respectively; p=0.005). There were no significant differences in the objective response rates or the disease control rates between the ramucirumab and sorafenib groups (9.1% and 54.5% vs. 0.0% and 22.2%, respectively). CONCLUSION Subsequent systemic therapy with ramucirumab showed a better ability to control tumor progression than sorafenib in HCC patients with serum AFP levels ≥400 ng/ml.